Chatterbot robbie amell dating 2016
A pseudocode version might be more useful to experienced programmers but perhaps less so to neophytes or non-programmers since it would be impossible for them to run it.
If an adventurous reader wants to execute some code, I think an external link would do the trick.
It's not going to be very helpful for 99% of our readers.
I think we should, if not remove it outright, recast this as pseudocode, and, if it would be helpful, provide an external link to source code.
I think including a simple chatterbot in pseudocode (and the resulting conversation) could be an excellent piece of illustration, but I don't think we should use Wikipedia as a repository for sample source code.
— Matt , (UTC)I'm not sure if this conversation is dead or not, but I figured I'd add my two cents anyway.